This is a reproduction of an November
20, 1996 letter from John Gregory Lambros
to the Federal District Court requesting subpoena of, and payment
for,
expert witnesses to testify at the resentancing of
Lambros.
John Gregory Lambros
Reg. No. 00436-124
USP Leavenworth
P.O. Box 1000
Leavenworth, Kansas 66048-1000
Web site: http://www.brazilboycott.org
November 20, 1996
U.S. FEDERAL JUDGE RENNER ATTORNEY COLIA F. CEISEL
Room 748 Suite 500, Minnesota Bldg.
Warren E. Burger Federal Bldg. 46 East 4th Street
316 North Robert Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
U.S. Certified Mail No.P-192-018-678
RE: RESENTENCING/COMPETENCY HEARING OF JOHN G. LAMBROS IN
U.S. vs. LAMBROS, FILE NO. 4-89-82
Dear Judge Renner & Attorney Ceisel:
I am requesting the Court to subpoena Dr. Kenneth J.
Criqui, Jr. for the competency hearing in my
resentencing.
As you both know, Dr. Criqui submitted the competency
evaluation to Judge Murphy prior to my sentencing and met with Judge
Murphy in her chambers regarding same.
Dr. Criqui has agreed to testify as to his findings and is
requesting one (1) follow-up examination with John Gregory Lambros at
least two (2) days before testifying.
An attorney friend of mine has been in contact with Dr. Criqui
who is currently employed in California. It is also my understanding
that Dr. Criqui's employer has been in contact with Warden Page True
here at USP Leavenworth as to Dr. Criqui's testimony and scheduling
for travel to Minnesota.
Please contact my attorney for the correct address of Dr.
Criqui so this Court may issue a subpoena and funding for Dr.
Criqui's travel and expenses to revisit Lambros and testify in front
of this Court.
In Dr. Criqui's January 19, 1994 Competency Evaluation of John
G. Lambros, Page 11, he stated to the Court:
c) Once you have gotten an x-ray that shows an
artifact, (something structurally inappropriate) you tend to
believe there is something there. When a second x-ray doesn't show
what the first one did and you note that the intensity setting has
been diminished, you wonder why and whether, were the intensity
kept constant, the artifact would show up again.
d) What kind of thesis would define an artifact as "a piece
of dust"? No dictionary does. With reference to page five,
footnote three of the October 30, 1992, Order of Magistrate,
Franklin C. Noel, had the footnote stated that dust can cause the
appearance of an artifact, it would be considered accurate and
fair. To begin by defining an artifact as lint, demonstrates
absolute prejudice.
Page 8, Note 5:
... If there are no implants and Mr. Lambros doesn't
believe there are, (a polygraph would demonstrate this) then he
worked longer and harder at demonstrating the most easily
refutable rationale for imcompetency one can imagine... He
requested a polygraph while at FMC Rochester, but that request was
denied.
Dr. Criqui's January 19, 1994, ADDENDUM TO COMPETENCY
EVALUATION of John Gregory Lambros page 2 to Judge Murphy:
The government could not have done a better job of
instilling fear and paranoia in Mr. Lambros had they hired a
psychiatrist to plan this out. First, Mr. Lambros was sent to FMC
Rochester. The first x-ray showed something, and while the second
showed nothing, it is plain and evident that the second x-ray was
taken at a different setting and is therefore quite invalid to
compare to the first. How better to make the subject think that
the government is just involved in "another one of its
cover-ups"?
Mr. Lambros relates another interesting event. He was taken
to Abbott-Northwestern Hospital by Marshals for testing by Dr.
Minette. The Marshals sat in the control room while a CT Scan was
taken. On the way back to the hospital, a Marshal told Mr. Lambros
that the technician said they found something in his skull.
Perhaps they did. But perhaps the Marshall was just having a
little fun with Mr. Lambros.
Judge Renner, please review the docket sheet as to the
affidavits I submitted from other inmates here at USP Leavenworth as
to the conversation(s) I had with the Marshal(s) at the holding cells
within the U.S. Marshals office within the Minneapolis, U.S.
Courthouse regarding technician(s) statement at Abbott- Northwestern
Hospital and there statement that something was in my skull.
Thanking both of you for your assistance in the subpoena of
Dr. Kenneth J. Criqui for my competency evaluation hearing. Also,
Attorney Charles Faulkner never issued the correct papers to the
Courts to pay Dr. Criqui for his last evaluation which was paid for
by the Lambros family. I have addressed this issue before to this
Court to no avail.
Respectfully submitted,
{Signed}
John Gregory Lambros
c: Attorneys
Lambros family
Dr. Kenneth J. Criqui via Attorney
Web site release on BOYCOTT BRAZIL:
http://www.brazilboycott.org
Press
File
The
address for the Boycott Brazil homepage is:
http://www.brazilboycott.org
For more information write (snail mail) JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS
directly at:
JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS
Prisoner No. 00436-124
U. S. Penitentiary Leavenworth
PO Box 1000
Leavenworth, KS 66048-1000
USA
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND ASSISTANCE IN
MY BOYCOTT OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS.