April 18, 2000
John Gregory Lambros
Reg. No. 00436-124
P.O. Box 1000
Leavenworth, Kansas 66048-1000USA
Web site: www.brazilboycott.org
TO: Dr. Antony C. Sutton, Editor of PHOENIX LETTER & FUTURE TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE REPORT.
RE: YOUR UNDATED LETTER TO JOHN G. LAMBROS - RECEIVED BY LAMBROS ON APRIL 17, 2000.
Dear Dr. Sutton:
This is an open letter to you and the world as to your undated letter to me, received on April 17, 2000, in which you stated:
Dear Mr. Lambros:
I asked you repeatedly not to use my name. - You have equally used my name in public and private and on the internet. - This is the last warning. Remove my name (and PHOENIX [Phoenix] LETTER) from the Internet, and elsewhere immediately. I sympathize with your position but you are not going to get anywhere by abusing my privacy. - Remove my name NOW. If you do not I will plaster YOUR name in a hundred places . . . starting with your parole board. - ANTONY SUTTON. [the letter was postmarked from Reno, Nevada]
On or about April, 1995, you contacted my Attorney regarding my torture, forced implantation by Brazilian Officials, and denial of due process during my extradition from Brazil and during my trial in Minnesota. We exchanged hundreds of documents to support the truth of my story and you in turn commenced researching same using government inquiry via Freedom of Information Act requests, etc.
You printed stories as to your research within your August and October, 1995, PHOENIX LETTERS that are distributed to subscribers of the PHOENIX LETTER. On August 1, 1995, you authorized me to reproduce all I wanted from the PHOENIX LETTER or FTIR, thus coping and distributing same to talk radio, etc.
Now, as per your above referenced letter I received on April 17, 2000, 1 am quoting same verbatim, the first time I've done same due to your irrational behavior or due to the fact some government and/or military agency is trying to pressure you into rolling over and becoming part of there NAZI rogue grouping.
You have an excellent reputation throughout the world for your research and have been quoted as saying that you've been a "PROBLEM" since your days at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, in exposing the TRUTH.
April 18, 2000
RE: LAMBROS' OPEN LETTER TO DR. SUTTON
Now lets take a minute to analyze your letter that I received on April 17, 2000: 1. You ask me not to use your name. How can this be done if your name is on the first page of every PHOENIX LETTER as the EDITOR???? You gave me written permission to reproduce the PHOENIX LETTER and I choose to use the mail and the internet to release same. 2. You state that I have equally used your name in public and private and on the internet. Yes, I have submitted your PHOENIX LETTER to over ONE MILLION PEOPLE AND NEWS SERVICES GLOBALLY via the internet, thus this must be the way your name was used in public, not in direct reference to your name, as I have not had any media interviews within Leavenworth.
3. You state that this is my last warning and to remove your name and PHOENIX [Phoenix] LETTER from the internet and elsewhere immediately. As per our original agreement in releasing my information to you, and your August 1, 1995 authorization to the right to "REPRODUCE ALL YOU WANT FROM PHOENIX LETTER OR FTIR BUT DON'T QUOTE MY LETTERS TO YOU. . . . ITS BASICALLY UP TO YOU TO COPY AND DISTRIBUTE." I RESPECTFULLY REFUSE TO REMOVE THE AUGUST AND OCTOBER, 1995 "PHOENIX LETTERS FROM MY WEB SITE: www.brazilboycott.org
4. You then state you sympathize with my position but I'm abusing you privacy. As an editor that has exposed more corrupt government employees than most, how can you now say that I'm abusing your privacy when you knew the NAZI SCUM BRAZILIANS AND U.S. AGENTS THAT DID THIS TO ME WOULD TRY TO STRIKE BACK SOMEDAY WHEN I CORN- ERED THEM IN COURT. WHY DON'T YOU ASK ME FOR HELP AND I'LL TELL THE WORLD TO PLACE MORE E-MAIL AND COMMERCIAL LIENS ON THE BRAZILIANS GLOBALLY THEN THEY WILL EVER HAVE TIME TO SORT.
5. You threaten me with plastering my name in a hundred places . . . starting with the PAROLE BOARD. It will be my pleasure to have you plaster my name in a hundred places, in fact I'm going to help you by PLASTERING this letter within my web site and distributing it to over 100,000 places to get things going for starters. Secondly, when you contact the PAROLE BOARD you might inform them I'm finishing up my appeal brief in JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. J.W. BOOKER & U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, Case No. 98-3148-RDR, and requesting the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals to review the clear and convincing evidence of "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE," "WHOLESALE SUPPRESSION OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE," and the "FABRICATION OF INCULPATORY EVIDENCE" by the U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, U.S. ATTORNEYS OFFICE IN KANSAS AND MINNESOTA, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, and the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, as to the following facts that do not allow the current August 21, 1989, U.S. Parole Commission Warrant to be used as a DETAINER punishable by 5,357 days:
a. Lambros was arrested on May 17, 1991, on the August 21, 1989 U.S. Parole Violation Warrant by U.S. DEA and Brazilian Federal Agents as per the testimony of DEA Agent Terryl Anderson who was one of the arresting officers. Page 3
April 18, 2000
RE: LAMBROS' OPEN LETTER TO DR. SUTTON.
b. Refusal by the U.S. Parole Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of State, or a Warden from a Federal Penitentiary within the United States to file a duly certified copy of the August 21, 1989, U.S. Parole Commission Warrant with the Brazilian Supreme Court, as per the requirements of ARTICLE IX, of the U.S. - BRAZIL EXTRADITION TREATY. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1358 (Wash. 1997)(available within the BOYCOTT BRAZIL web site: www.brazilboycott.org)(use the search engine and enter Article IX) C. Article XXI of the U.S. - BRAZIL EXTRADITION TREATY does not allow Lambros to be TRIED OR PUNISHED by the U.S. for any crime or offense committed prior to the request of extradition, other than that which gave rise to the request for extradition. See, PANG, at 1360. Therefore, the August 21, 1989, U.S. Parole Commission Warrant is not valid as it was not presented to the Brazilian Supreme Court. The U.S. Parole Commission and all parties have been aware of this fact from on or about 1993 and have intentionally obstructed justice in suppressing the facts that have caused 170 million Brazilians to be exposed to BOYCOTTS and SELECTIVE PURCHASING ORDINANCES.
d. Article V(4) of the U.S. - BRAZILIAN EXTRADITION TREATY does not allow extradition to a person who must appear before an EXTRAORDINARY TRIBUNAL OR COURT. The U.S. Parole Commission is an agency and not a U.S. District Court within the U.S. See, PANG, at 1357. May I suggest that you review the definition of the RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT, Title 18, U.S.C. 1961 and review the following statutes under RICO, TITLE 18 U.S.C.:
a. § 1341 relating to mail fraud;
b. § 1343 relating to wire fraud;
C. § 1503 relating to obstruction of justice;
d. § 1510 relating to obstruction of criminal investigation;
e. § 1511 relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement;
f. § 1951 relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion;
as it may be the only way the above corrupt government officials will ever be brought to justice.
I sorry our relationship has ended this way, but be assured that the Lambros family will always be indebted to you, as I am, for your support in being the first U.S. Editor to release my story with copy of the x-ray reports of my implants.
Thanking you again for your continued support and apology for not being able to remove copies of the PHOENIX LETTER from my web site due to your release in 1995.
For more information write (snail mail) JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS directly at:
JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS
Prisoner No. 00436-124
U. S. Penitentiary Leavenworth
PO Box 1000
Leavenworth, KS 66048-1000
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND ASSISTANCE IN MY BOYCOTT OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS.